01-07-2009, 06:32 PM
Just thinking a bit more...
The format should be more like "%t%r%e%" so that in the case there are letters before. This seem to work out a lot better!
With the way I am formatting it comes out : "%t%%r%%e%" (having the extra % character doesn't seem to make a difference though.
What if a SearchWord contains the wrong letters completely? How would something like that work?
Would it have something to do with [backets]?
The format should be more like "%t%r%e%" so that in the case there are letters before. This seem to work out a lot better!
With the way I am formatting it comes out : "%t%%r%%e%" (having the extra % character doesn't seem to make a difference though.
What if a SearchWord contains the wrong letters completely? How would something like that work?
Would it have something to do with [backets]?