Welcome!
I've been a heavy user of QM and LA for about two to three years now. Recently, I've been transitioning from using QM to LA for my work.
Regarding your questions, I've had similar inquiries before. Here's my understanding:
#1 Yes,
Menu: Code --> Input Recorder
#2 #3:
Macros recorded in LA or QM typically require adjustments, but the code generated by LA macros is generally easier to understand compared to QM.
Additionally, there isn't much value in converting QM code to LA. there is no provision for code conversion functions available, you can employ #4 to achieve mutual invocation.
#4:
Function calls between QM and LA can be made through HTTP requests, allowing for parameter passing. You can refer to the link below for more details.
https://www.quickmacros.com/forum/showth...p?tid=6290
https://www.quickmacros.com/forum/showth...6#pid36746
#5:
LA always provides first-time support for the latest .NET stable versions and features.
However, editing C# code in the LA code editor has its unique aspects that require some time to explore and adapt to. Once you become familiar with these, your coding efficiency will greatly improve.
For developing small desktop utility software, QM is more suitable. However, for large-scale projects, LA is more convenient due to the availability of numerous free and open-source C# libraries.
Regarding the differences between LA and other related programming languages, I think the explanation provided in the following link is quite good:
https://github.com/qgindi/LibreAutomate/...1715348517
I've been a heavy user of QM and LA for about two to three years now. Recently, I've been transitioning from using QM to LA for my work.
Regarding your questions, I've had similar inquiries before. Here's my understanding:
#1 Yes,
Menu: Code --> Input Recorder
#2 #3:
Macros recorded in LA or QM typically require adjustments, but the code generated by LA macros is generally easier to understand compared to QM.
Additionally, there isn't much value in converting QM code to LA. there is no provision for code conversion functions available, you can employ #4 to achieve mutual invocation.
#4:
Function calls between QM and LA can be made through HTTP requests, allowing for parameter passing. You can refer to the link below for more details.
https://www.quickmacros.com/forum/showth...p?tid=6290
https://www.quickmacros.com/forum/showth...6#pid36746
#5:
LA always provides first-time support for the latest .NET stable versions and features.
However, editing C# code in the LA code editor has its unique aspects that require some time to explore and adapt to. Once you become familiar with these, your coding efficiency will greatly improve.
For developing small desktop utility software, QM is more suitable. However, for large-scale projects, LA is more convenient due to the availability of numerous free and open-source C# libraries.
Regarding the differences between LA and other related programming languages, I think the explanation provided in the following link is quite good:
https://github.com/qgindi/LibreAutomate/...1715348517