06-30-2007, 04:53 PM
I tried your suggestion. Nothing changed.
The problem is definately on the receiving end and not the "sender" as you referenced.
Through comenting out one line at a time from the bottom, I've found the culprit to be:
For some reason the run command seems to be reducing the number of entries in the ply variable.
The problem is definately on the receiving end and not the "sender" as you referenced.
Through comenting out one line at a time from the bottom, I've found the culprit to be:
For some reason the run command seems to be reducing the number of entries in the ply variable.
